arn
Jan 1, 12:35 AM
Originally posted by IJ Reilly
The new front page looks awful, when I set the fonts to +1 in Safari. Unreadable, actually. I'd post a snapshot if I could in this forum.
You mean when you hit View -> Make Text Bigger?
It works for me. Let me know if this is not what you are talking about.
arn
The new front page looks awful, when I set the fonts to +1 in Safari. Unreadable, actually. I'd post a snapshot if I could in this forum.
You mean when you hit View -> Make Text Bigger?
It works for me. Let me know if this is not what you are talking about.
arn
Mlrollin91
Mar 11, 02:59 PM
Been at the Oaks for about 3 hours now.. Only about 20 people in line till the last 30 minutes, now its about 60. 4 hours to go.
josh2007
Mar 28, 12:32 AM
eMacs are still the best dedicated iTunes machine around. Those speakers are incredible. I have the all-white 1GHz w/Gig RAM. Sadly I think the FW port has stopped working.
WillEH
Mar 29, 05:44 PM
Interesting... but I can't imagine this.. :confused:
longgbow
May 4, 10:27 AM
Figured it out. It kept trying to relaunch because the wiki server was turned on for some reason(everything else was disabled). Disabled that and collabd quit.
Hi! I have the same problem and could you tell me how to disable the wiki server?
Thanks!
Hi! I have the same problem and could you tell me how to disable the wiki server?
Thanks!
TheSlush
Mar 16, 10:07 AM
http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/6849/imageeffectsabovedroppe.png (http://img130.imageshack.us/i/imageeffectsabovedroppe.png/)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/04/Web_browser_usage_share.svg/630px-Web_browser_usage_share.svg.png
I think Linux might have a higher install base than Mac....
I always laugh at these charts... it's like comparing the install base of Bentley to the install base of Toyota. Doesn't exactly tell the story, does it?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/04/Web_browser_usage_share.svg/630px-Web_browser_usage_share.svg.png
I think Linux might have a higher install base than Mac....
I always laugh at these charts... it's like comparing the install base of Bentley to the install base of Toyota. Doesn't exactly tell the story, does it?
-Ken-
Apr 19, 07:53 PM
They are silent now! New hard drives from Newegg fixed that :D
Michaelgtrusa
Nov 4, 08:15 PM
Try again.
.jpg "prom hairstyles half up half")
c23roo
Apr 21, 10:19 PM
Well, I have to use paired RAM, right? That's my only option...
The next question: Is there a difference performance-wise, between adding, say, 2 x 4GB or 4 x 2 GB? As I understand it, tri-channel only applies to the later Mac Pros...
The next question: Is there a difference performance-wise, between adding, say, 2 x 4GB or 4 x 2 GB? As I understand it, tri-channel only applies to the later Mac Pros...
labman
May 5, 08:41 AM
New colors besides pink and black made it a buy at $2. Lots of color options does not require Iacces
ir13
Mar 20, 02:41 AM
Why would you spread rumors of a 4.3.1? What's your source for the pwn2own "publically" found bug on 4.3? Do share wise one.
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Pwn2Own-2011-Day-2-iPhone-and-BlackBerry-hacked-1206254.html
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Pwn2Own-2011-Day-2-iPhone-and-BlackBerry-hacked-1206254.html
snberk103
Mar 12, 01:57 PM
I blush, and thanks.
Just make sure that you let us know what it is you do end up with!
A Mini is also not a bad idea.
1) Get a refurbished one to save some bucks. Max out the RAM yourself - save bucks over Apple doing it.
2) Add FW external HDDs for storage. They can be used on a Mac Pro or an iMac later on.
3) With the money saved on the Mini, you can get a high quality monitor. Also transferable to a Mac Pro or an iMac later (as a 2nd monitor). A good monitor can used for several to many years comfortably. Imho, it's better to produce better photos (because the monitor is accurate) and wait some extra seconds, than to get a faster computer but put out photos with inaccurate colour.
4) Start investing in the SW tools that you will want/need. These are also transferable to a new system.
5) When you finally spring for a fully loaded, 24 core, 512MB RAM, 72 TB Storage, 4 graphic cards, 4 Thunderbolt ports iMac Pro Supreme Tower all of the peripherals and software moves too.
It's how I got started. A small Mini with a 23" ACD. Everything I bought to go with it also had to work with a (future) Mac Pro. Eventually I was working with Photoshop files that were approaching 1GB, on a Mini with only 1GB of memory (the days when opening a Mini involved spludging).
There was a lot of HDD thrashing. I was afraid that PS would crash, so I saved often. It took so long to save a big file, that I could go out and mow the lawn or do the dishes while it thrashed away. I got a lot of housework done that summer. Ironically, that Mini never crashed. Not once.
Eventually I got my current Mac Pro, and it was like moving from steam trains to warp drive. All the peripherals and SW moved too, so the only cost was the Mac Pro itself plus the extra HDDs I added at the time.
That Mini then got hooked up the TV where it served up all of our music throughout the house, and movies to the TV for a couple of years. I've upgraded that Mini to a newer one but the first one still works, and I keep it as a spare.
Nah... I just feel sentimental for it. What a workhorse!
Just make sure that you let us know what it is you do end up with!
A Mini is also not a bad idea.
1) Get a refurbished one to save some bucks. Max out the RAM yourself - save bucks over Apple doing it.
2) Add FW external HDDs for storage. They can be used on a Mac Pro or an iMac later on.
3) With the money saved on the Mini, you can get a high quality monitor. Also transferable to a Mac Pro or an iMac later (as a 2nd monitor). A good monitor can used for several to many years comfortably. Imho, it's better to produce better photos (because the monitor is accurate) and wait some extra seconds, than to get a faster computer but put out photos with inaccurate colour.
4) Start investing in the SW tools that you will want/need. These are also transferable to a new system.
5) When you finally spring for a fully loaded, 24 core, 512MB RAM, 72 TB Storage, 4 graphic cards, 4 Thunderbolt ports iMac Pro Supreme Tower all of the peripherals and software moves too.
It's how I got started. A small Mini with a 23" ACD. Everything I bought to go with it also had to work with a (future) Mac Pro. Eventually I was working with Photoshop files that were approaching 1GB, on a Mini with only 1GB of memory (the days when opening a Mini involved spludging).
There was a lot of HDD thrashing. I was afraid that PS would crash, so I saved often. It took so long to save a big file, that I could go out and mow the lawn or do the dishes while it thrashed away. I got a lot of housework done that summer. Ironically, that Mini never crashed. Not once.
Eventually I got my current Mac Pro, and it was like moving from steam trains to warp drive. All the peripherals and SW moved too, so the only cost was the Mac Pro itself plus the extra HDDs I added at the time.
That Mini then got hooked up the TV where it served up all of our music throughout the house, and movies to the TV for a couple of years. I've upgraded that Mini to a newer one but the first one still works, and I keep it as a spare.
Nah... I just feel sentimental for it. What a workhorse!
snberk103
Mar 10, 12:51 PM
...
Sounds like you should be looking at an iMac.
As stated before, I want and need the expansion of the Mac Pro.
My own reason for getting my Mac Pro (2008 Octo Core) was that I intend the keep the computer for 3 - 5 years. Now that I'm just starting my 3rd year I'm confident that I can hit the 5 year mark. My personal feelings are that Mac Pros are for long-term ownership. At least for us small businesses. I know some big corps swap them out every couple of years.
iMacs are a better value for the computing power, but I don't believe they are suitable for long-term ownership. I don't actually think they are hard to expand, if you don't mind a stack of FW 800 HDDs.
Photo editing doesn't actually require a fantastic video card. It just needs to display accurate colour. More expensive cards are for gaming and movies, where things are moving at a rapid rate. If you don't do those things, then I don't believe you need to worry about upgrading the video card.
Memory is another matter.
Mac Pros support more, except for perhaps a small overlap between the low-end MP and high-end iMac (don't know that for sure, but it wouldn't surprise me). Time moves on, applications demand more RAM. I know that my MP still has lots and lots of expansion left in that department. Incidentally, giving your OS, Applications, etc enough RAM is the single most effective way to speed up your workflow. The moment you start writing to virtual memory you are start bogging down.
One thing to keep in mind is that for Mac Pros, you get a RAM slot per processor. So, all other things being equal (same type of architecture in the MP) an 8 core MP can handle more RAM than a 6 core, and a 4 core can handle the least. Do some research on your RAM needs (current and future) before jumping on an 8 core machine just for the RAM ceiling. You very likely will never need that much. But... there it is.
A Mac Pro is also more easily fixed, I believe. Something to consider if you are thinking long-term.
Apple promised something called Grand Central Dispatch in 2010 or yet to be delivered. Check it out on the Apple site. It promised to make it easier for application developers to multi-thread their programs. Photo editing suites are not really taking advantage of this, yet. But if they ever do an older multi-cored machine should stay current for a few more years.
My thinking is: If you want to get a really good machine now, and think you'll be getting another one in a 1-3 years then go iMac. When you buy peripherals for it, make sure that they will also work on a Mac Pro, so you can upgrade easily.
If you want a machine for 3-5 years, then think Mac Pro. More $$ up front, but I think you will save money over the 5 years.
Just some more grist for your mill.
everything here is, imho, of course....
Sounds like you should be looking at an iMac.
As stated before, I want and need the expansion of the Mac Pro.
My own reason for getting my Mac Pro (2008 Octo Core) was that I intend the keep the computer for 3 - 5 years. Now that I'm just starting my 3rd year I'm confident that I can hit the 5 year mark. My personal feelings are that Mac Pros are for long-term ownership. At least for us small businesses. I know some big corps swap them out every couple of years.
iMacs are a better value for the computing power, but I don't believe they are suitable for long-term ownership. I don't actually think they are hard to expand, if you don't mind a stack of FW 800 HDDs.
Photo editing doesn't actually require a fantastic video card. It just needs to display accurate colour. More expensive cards are for gaming and movies, where things are moving at a rapid rate. If you don't do those things, then I don't believe you need to worry about upgrading the video card.
Memory is another matter.
Mac Pros support more, except for perhaps a small overlap between the low-end MP and high-end iMac (don't know that for sure, but it wouldn't surprise me). Time moves on, applications demand more RAM. I know that my MP still has lots and lots of expansion left in that department. Incidentally, giving your OS, Applications, etc enough RAM is the single most effective way to speed up your workflow. The moment you start writing to virtual memory you are start bogging down.
One thing to keep in mind is that for Mac Pros, you get a RAM slot per processor. So, all other things being equal (same type of architecture in the MP) an 8 core MP can handle more RAM than a 6 core, and a 4 core can handle the least. Do some research on your RAM needs (current and future) before jumping on an 8 core machine just for the RAM ceiling. You very likely will never need that much. But... there it is.
A Mac Pro is also more easily fixed, I believe. Something to consider if you are thinking long-term.
Apple promised something called Grand Central Dispatch in 2010 or yet to be delivered. Check it out on the Apple site. It promised to make it easier for application developers to multi-thread their programs. Photo editing suites are not really taking advantage of this, yet. But if they ever do an older multi-cored machine should stay current for a few more years.
My thinking is: If you want to get a really good machine now, and think you'll be getting another one in a 1-3 years then go iMac. When you buy peripherals for it, make sure that they will also work on a Mac Pro, so you can upgrade easily.
If you want a machine for 3-5 years, then think Mac Pro. More $$ up front, but I think you will save money over the 5 years.
Just some more grist for your mill.
everything here is, imho, of course....
calciphus
Oct 20, 03:51 AM
Sorry to burst everyone's bubble, but this is most likely for cameras that either have GPS integrated already (and some do) or for cameras like the Nikon D200 or D2X that have a port on the side specifically for hooking up a GPS device like this one:
http://www.redhensystems.com/products/video_collection_hardware/d2x-gps.asp
Since the EXIF standard contains a flag for GPS-data, they just didn't finish the feature yet. They will.
So no, the iPhone isn't going to be a gps camera pda music playing satellite radio streaming HDTV. Get over it. The iPhone already came out, and flopped (how many ROKRs do you see?) My guess is that if Apple really wants to move into that space, they're going to have to serriously look at their market, and their network partner.
Though Cingular has more users, Verizon and Sprint both have the high-speed data networks capable of integrating a phone with iTunes. Cingular simply doesn't. Verizon users spend, on average, more on downloads than any other non-MVNO provider.
Oh, and as for GPS already being in phones, it's there. Every phone sold after 01/01/04 had to have a GPS tracking device installed for use in Emergency situations. Providers were given six years to get a 95% adoption rate. Ever notice that little crosshair in the top? That means you've got a GPS lock. With SiRF-III GPS chips, you can be pretty well underground and still get a signal, esp. when it's repeated by your cell towers.
This isn't an iPhone clue. Get over yourselves.
http://www.redhensystems.com/products/video_collection_hardware/d2x-gps.asp
Since the EXIF standard contains a flag for GPS-data, they just didn't finish the feature yet. They will.
So no, the iPhone isn't going to be a gps camera pda music playing satellite radio streaming HDTV. Get over it. The iPhone already came out, and flopped (how many ROKRs do you see?) My guess is that if Apple really wants to move into that space, they're going to have to serriously look at their market, and their network partner.
Though Cingular has more users, Verizon and Sprint both have the high-speed data networks capable of integrating a phone with iTunes. Cingular simply doesn't. Verizon users spend, on average, more on downloads than any other non-MVNO provider.
Oh, and as for GPS already being in phones, it's there. Every phone sold after 01/01/04 had to have a GPS tracking device installed for use in Emergency situations. Providers were given six years to get a 95% adoption rate. Ever notice that little crosshair in the top? That means you've got a GPS lock. With SiRF-III GPS chips, you can be pretty well underground and still get a signal, esp. when it's repeated by your cell towers.
This isn't an iPhone clue. Get over yourselves.
MisterMe
Jan 9, 08:45 PM
what was I supposed to do? what forever for a reply that will never come just because it was posted on the wrong part of the forum?!
Come on!.. this is not corrective action, this is all the way rude.. :mad:There are standards of behavior for this forum. Everyone is expected to follow them, even if they are inconvenient. That includes you. Each member of this forum has access to every thread. If nobody responds to your post, then you should seek help elsewhere.
Come on!.. this is not corrective action, this is all the way rude.. :mad:There are standards of behavior for this forum. Everyone is expected to follow them, even if they are inconvenient. That includes you. Each member of this forum has access to every thread. If nobody responds to your post, then you should seek help elsewhere.
Hilmi Hamidi
Nov 13, 05:10 PM
http://img260.imagevenue.com/loc97/th_89324_Untitled_122_97lo.jpg (http://img260.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=89324_Untitled_122_97lo.jpg)
prom hairstyles half up half
prom hairstyles half up curly.
prom hairstyles half up
Sdashiki
Dec 8, 08:55 AM
If you are seriously trying to run a business, or make money doing this...and youve had to ask these questions...you are in over your head perhaps.
If its in illustrator format, you need illustrator to work on it...
If its in illustrator format, you need illustrator to work on it...
CCornell
Sep 20, 04:16 PM
Toe, I would be interested in buying this from you. Thanks.
wdlove
Sep 11, 07:17 PM
My wife and I were at home. For some reason she had the urge to turn on the TV. We stayed glued to the TV for hours. Like others watching history unfold before our very eyes.
Our church had a special prayer for the 9/11 victims today.
Our church had a special prayer for the 9/11 victims today.
rdowns
Apr 20, 03:37 PM
AAPL up 3% aftermarket.
With the recent pullback, I expect it to soar after hours.
With the recent pullback, I expect it to soar after hours.
Cameront9
Aug 7, 06:22 PM
So with WMP gone and now VPC gone, the only MAJOR software developed for Macs by Microsoft is Office?
Let's just hope they don't decide to kill office. Sure, I know there are lots of alternatives out there, but you try telling that to Mr. idiot joe-average boss.
Edit: Looks like I spoke too soon, fortunately:
http://www.macnn.com/articles/06/08/07/universal.office.coming/
Let's just hope they don't decide to kill office. Sure, I know there are lots of alternatives out there, but you try telling that to Mr. idiot joe-average boss.
Edit: Looks like I spoke too soon, fortunately:
http://www.macnn.com/articles/06/08/07/universal.office.coming/
digitalbiker
Oct 24, 08:06 PM
I think these are great improvements. I have been waiting forever for decent OpenGL performance on par with windows. Also resolution independence is the best thing since sliced bread.
Now the compaints against high-res screens producing small fonts can be put to rest forever. We can always opt for a higher res screen and not have to worry about going blind.
Now if only Apple would address the s-s-s-s-l--l---l---oo-oooo-----w---w--wwww finder. I'll be in heaven.
Now the compaints against high-res screens producing small fonts can be put to rest forever. We can always opt for a higher res screen and not have to worry about going blind.
Now if only Apple would address the s-s-s-s-l--l---l---oo-oooo-----w---w--wwww finder. I'll be in heaven.
HexMonkey
Jan 22, 02:02 PM
Hex Monkey, could you give a link for this quote?
Here (http://www.ambrosiasw.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=91049&hl=wiretap+free) it is, second post.
Here (http://www.ambrosiasw.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=91049&hl=wiretap+free) it is, second post.
tag
Dec 19, 02:32 PM
I had Googled for a Roman Numeral for "million" but came up unsatisfied.
According to what I remember and the sites I saw, to get Roman Numerals higher than Thousands(M), you would need to put a bar over the numerals, which effectively multiplies the numeral by 1000.
So instead of MMMMM, you could use a V-bar, such as:
_
V = 5,000
And for one million you'd have the following called an M-bar:
_
M = 1,000,000
Though I bet most people that see the icon would be like 'what in the...'
According to what I remember and the sites I saw, to get Roman Numerals higher than Thousands(M), you would need to put a bar over the numerals, which effectively multiplies the numeral by 1000.
So instead of MMMMM, you could use a V-bar, such as:
_
V = 5,000
And for one million you'd have the following called an M-bar:
_
M = 1,000,000
Though I bet most people that see the icon would be like 'what in the...'
No comments:
Post a Comment