icedd
Nov 8, 07:40 PM
I like. :)
Thanks!
Thanks!
andrewmon
Apr 3, 09:15 PM
Hey guys -
I narrowed my choices down to these two. Just need a little more input to make my final decision. Thanks all.
I narrowed my choices down to these two. Just need a little more input to make my final decision. Thanks all.
ipacmm
Sep 19, 07:18 AM
I agree with others, it has a nice clean design to it.
joepunk
Sep 11, 11:18 AM
It was 10 days before my second year of Community College classes were to start. I was in bed, just sort of waking up when my dad called to me to see what was happening on the TV. I was thinking from his reactions that what was happening was another Oklahoma style bombing or something (at that point I still had not made it to the living room and seen anything on the TV yet). Well my thoughts were quickly changed after seeing the first few minutes of the coverage
AppleScruff1
Apr 20, 06:52 PM
Dear god....
That's absolutely crazy numbers.
Glad I am an apple share holder.
Sky is the limit for Apple tree.
Apple will be trillion dollars company...
How many thousands of shares do you own?
That's absolutely crazy numbers.
Glad I am an apple share holder.
Sky is the limit for Apple tree.
Apple will be trillion dollars company...
How many thousands of shares do you own?
sinsin07
Apr 16, 12:27 PM
That is what gaming is ;). Sorry, but uh, gaming is killing time. You really think you do something productive when you game? No, you do something fun that you enjoy in your spare time. And if it isn't your spare time.. then you're going to find it hard to pay your bills in the real world if you are so addicted to gaming you are doing it rather than the stuff you *need* to do (like go to work).
This is a rant, so no comment necessary.
Depends on what you are talking about. RPGS like final fantasy? Sorry, really don't need tactile controls for that. In ways, touch is better cause you don't have to go scrolling for the command you want, you can instantly touch what you want to do.I never mentioned RPGs.
Honestly, we can take your argument further. Your console games suck cause they don't have enough controls like a computer game does. For example try doing a realistic flight sim on a console? Ain't going to happen. You need a lot more ability to do a lot of commands (and quickly, not just scrolling through), something having a keyboard with a lot more ways to have different commands, gives you. I'm actually amazed some one did a decent flight sim (of course it has the same problem as consoles do, but actually if I were on a bigger screen like an iPad, it probably could be better than consoles cause they can just have you touch the controls on the "dashboard" giving you more options to control than a controller with limited buttons. So once again, touch screen is better than a control pad, but only if you have enough real estate on that touch screen).
Not sure why you bring up consoles based on your earlier comment, or did you forget what you wrote? This happens from time to time when you tend to write to much. You lose your train of thought....snip Consoles shouldn't even be discussed in this discussion. That is like comparing apples and oranges, they really have no bearing in this at all.
In any regard, your knowledge of what is possible shows a fundamental lack of imagination. You seem to keep missing the point of more complicated control mechanisms, a gamer does not want to look away from the screen to find a control. Touch screen too often for complicated games has you looking for where the action button is.
Of course, for some games, the controller on a console is better cause you do want some simplicity. And then there are games like racing games where sorry, your controller SUX! I'll take my iphone's tilt control on a racing game over a frikkin d-pad or joy stick. Of course, the best for that is an actual steering wheel and pedals :).
Racing games suck for a non gamer. A controller gives more finite control of the physics of driving.
What type of control is best depends on the game ;). You can't just generalize here and you're being very short sighted if you think the controller is a end all be all and that there aren't things touch screen is better for.
None of which you proved in your counter points. Ask any gamer, any real gamer, what he would prefer Grand Turismo or Forenza.
I'm going to turn this around on you. Mario? Are you frikkin kidding me? Yeah, I am going to compare them both... they're both cheesy little games. What is with some of you people and your Mario love? There are far better games out there. And I hate how Nintendo just does Mario everything. Mario racing cart? Why not Gran Turismo? That's a far better and much more in depth racing game. Even Need for Speed is far better.
Mario is a great party game when you have people over I guess. Nintendo I suppose is good for kiddy games and social games. But honestly, I can't believe you're holding up the Mario name and having some sort of snub about being a real gamer. Mario is as much a time waster as Angry Birds (Which honestly isn't a bad thing, cheesy games that are just fun but you don't have to get into can be fun in their own right. But don't frikkin sit there and tell me I don't like in depth games and use *mario* as your example. Shoot, in general Nintendo isn't better for that really, they're "time wasters" are just in a different format. I would honestly think some one who cares about in depth would be more interested in Xbox or Playstation. I'm sure Nintendo has some but I am sure having a hard time finding any for the Wii my mom gave me).
Damn, you really just don't get gaming. Your comparisons show it. Yes there are better games than the Mario series, but better is subjective. Younger people may not get Metal Gear Solid/Socom/GTA etc. Your dislike or not understanding the popularity of Mario is not relevant. Millions and millions and millions of Mario games sell,. Why? Because people like them. You stand alone and out of the loop. But that's OK. It's you're personal preference.
In regard to Mario Cart specifically, it is one fun game to play alone or with people, especially if you have children. Totally different audience than Gran Turismo. The in depth comment was not used in relation to Mario. You got that mixed up. However, the Mario side scroll and 3D games are in comparison far more in depth and challenging than "Angry Birds." Sorry that is just the way it is.
I thought when you said depth you meant actually having a story and having to get into the game to finish it cause you need to get through all sorts of levels vs. this game is fun to play at any time. Most of Mario isn't something you need to get into for long periods of time, you can pick it up and play for a bit, play with others, have fun, but you aren't really getting into some extended play (I'll give you that Mario RPG had a story, but it still was more cheesy/humorous. I still prefer my Square soft RPGs, and even Breath of Fire IV).
You're guessing what I'm thinking now?
Well.
1. Usually multiplayers require the people run the same system so your scenario wouldn't happen.
That is why I used "if possible". The precedent for multi platform interplay is being set by Steam with PS3, MAC and PC on Portal 2. Maybe you missed my earlier link.
2. I prefer solitary games to multi-player games (I will admit I'm not huge into games like Doom or whatever the equivalent is these days. The only shooting games I like are ones with a good story, usually horror story, like Silent Hill). My favorite games have a story that unveils as you play it, usually those are more solitary games. So I don't really care about playing against others..
That old personal prefrence thing is rearing it's ugly head again. No one cares about what you like.
3. Which makes sense I am not a huge Nintendo fan, it's great more for social and kiddy games. Sony and Microsoft cater more to my kind of games.
I took the libertiy to highlight some key items in red. These indicate the "I"ism of your thinking. Never try to make a point in forum relation to yourself. In this case the I's don't have it.
This is a rant, so no comment necessary.
Depends on what you are talking about. RPGS like final fantasy? Sorry, really don't need tactile controls for that. In ways, touch is better cause you don't have to go scrolling for the command you want, you can instantly touch what you want to do.I never mentioned RPGs.
Honestly, we can take your argument further. Your console games suck cause they don't have enough controls like a computer game does. For example try doing a realistic flight sim on a console? Ain't going to happen. You need a lot more ability to do a lot of commands (and quickly, not just scrolling through), something having a keyboard with a lot more ways to have different commands, gives you. I'm actually amazed some one did a decent flight sim (of course it has the same problem as consoles do, but actually if I were on a bigger screen like an iPad, it probably could be better than consoles cause they can just have you touch the controls on the "dashboard" giving you more options to control than a controller with limited buttons. So once again, touch screen is better than a control pad, but only if you have enough real estate on that touch screen).
Not sure why you bring up consoles based on your earlier comment, or did you forget what you wrote? This happens from time to time when you tend to write to much. You lose your train of thought....snip Consoles shouldn't even be discussed in this discussion. That is like comparing apples and oranges, they really have no bearing in this at all.
In any regard, your knowledge of what is possible shows a fundamental lack of imagination. You seem to keep missing the point of more complicated control mechanisms, a gamer does not want to look away from the screen to find a control. Touch screen too often for complicated games has you looking for where the action button is.
Of course, for some games, the controller on a console is better cause you do want some simplicity. And then there are games like racing games where sorry, your controller SUX! I'll take my iphone's tilt control on a racing game over a frikkin d-pad or joy stick. Of course, the best for that is an actual steering wheel and pedals :).
Racing games suck for a non gamer. A controller gives more finite control of the physics of driving.
What type of control is best depends on the game ;). You can't just generalize here and you're being very short sighted if you think the controller is a end all be all and that there aren't things touch screen is better for.
None of which you proved in your counter points. Ask any gamer, any real gamer, what he would prefer Grand Turismo or Forenza.
I'm going to turn this around on you. Mario? Are you frikkin kidding me? Yeah, I am going to compare them both... they're both cheesy little games. What is with some of you people and your Mario love? There are far better games out there. And I hate how Nintendo just does Mario everything. Mario racing cart? Why not Gran Turismo? That's a far better and much more in depth racing game. Even Need for Speed is far better.
Mario is a great party game when you have people over I guess. Nintendo I suppose is good for kiddy games and social games. But honestly, I can't believe you're holding up the Mario name and having some sort of snub about being a real gamer. Mario is as much a time waster as Angry Birds (Which honestly isn't a bad thing, cheesy games that are just fun but you don't have to get into can be fun in their own right. But don't frikkin sit there and tell me I don't like in depth games and use *mario* as your example. Shoot, in general Nintendo isn't better for that really, they're "time wasters" are just in a different format. I would honestly think some one who cares about in depth would be more interested in Xbox or Playstation. I'm sure Nintendo has some but I am sure having a hard time finding any for the Wii my mom gave me).
Damn, you really just don't get gaming. Your comparisons show it. Yes there are better games than the Mario series, but better is subjective. Younger people may not get Metal Gear Solid/Socom/GTA etc. Your dislike or not understanding the popularity of Mario is not relevant. Millions and millions and millions of Mario games sell,. Why? Because people like them. You stand alone and out of the loop. But that's OK. It's you're personal preference.
In regard to Mario Cart specifically, it is one fun game to play alone or with people, especially if you have children. Totally different audience than Gran Turismo. The in depth comment was not used in relation to Mario. You got that mixed up. However, the Mario side scroll and 3D games are in comparison far more in depth and challenging than "Angry Birds." Sorry that is just the way it is.
I thought when you said depth you meant actually having a story and having to get into the game to finish it cause you need to get through all sorts of levels vs. this game is fun to play at any time. Most of Mario isn't something you need to get into for long periods of time, you can pick it up and play for a bit, play with others, have fun, but you aren't really getting into some extended play (I'll give you that Mario RPG had a story, but it still was more cheesy/humorous. I still prefer my Square soft RPGs, and even Breath of Fire IV).
You're guessing what I'm thinking now?
Well.
1. Usually multiplayers require the people run the same system so your scenario wouldn't happen.
That is why I used "if possible". The precedent for multi platform interplay is being set by Steam with PS3, MAC and PC on Portal 2. Maybe you missed my earlier link.
2. I prefer solitary games to multi-player games (I will admit I'm not huge into games like Doom or whatever the equivalent is these days. The only shooting games I like are ones with a good story, usually horror story, like Silent Hill). My favorite games have a story that unveils as you play it, usually those are more solitary games. So I don't really care about playing against others..
That old personal prefrence thing is rearing it's ugly head again. No one cares about what you like.
3. Which makes sense I am not a huge Nintendo fan, it's great more for social and kiddy games. Sony and Microsoft cater more to my kind of games.
I took the libertiy to highlight some key items in red. These indicate the "I"ism of your thinking. Never try to make a point in forum relation to yourself. In this case the I's don't have it.
neocell
Sep 24, 01:11 AM
If it's a copy protected dvd you can use MacTheRipper to get the disc on your HD, it's free but you'll have to google it and hunt down a site as it's being "banned" and shifting all over, or PM me and I'll send you the dmg
calderone
Mar 10, 10:34 PM
You are reading into this a bit too much.
What Apple is referring to in the TN is that xinetd/inetd were deprecated as a means for users/admin and 3rd parties to launch daemons. Instead you should use launched.
That doesn't mean that Apple cannot use them as a means for launching and maintaining their own services. And indeed they are. The implementation noted in the Network Services Admin PDF is starkly different from how launchd is used.
What Apple is referring to in the TN is that xinetd/inetd were deprecated as a means for users/admin and 3rd parties to launch daemons. Instead you should use launched.
That doesn't mean that Apple cannot use them as a means for launching and maintaining their own services. And indeed they are. The implementation noted in the Network Services Admin PDF is starkly different from how launchd is used.
yg17
Dec 18, 03:39 PM
Thanks, but it needs to be 2.0 since it will have a hard drive, iPod nano, and PSP hooked up to it.
kakamobson
May 3, 03:43 AM
support extract images with alpha channel from video? If yes, it will be a highlight spot.
i think if you are willing to ,you can try it .
enjoy it!
i think if you are willing to ,you can try it .
enjoy it!
billysea
Apr 18, 12:15 PM
There are only two name choices for the next iPhone: iPhone 4G or iPhone 5. There will be no more naming games. The only reason they ever diverted from numbering conventions was because of confusion over the 3G being the iPhone 2.
The iPad 2 was a minor update. But they didn't call it the iPad s or something else equally lame. Every iPhone will have a number until Apple gives up on that completely and just goes with "the all new iPhone" or "the all new 2011 iPhone" like they do with their desktops and notebooks.
Sooner or later, the "g" will sound like an inferior upgrade. It will give people the impression of it being a .5 upgrade. Everybody will wait for a proper number sequel.
The reason why the iPad 2 was named '2' in the very last minute was probably due to the overwhelming speculation that the tech is just a minor upgrade and people want to wait for a proper iPad 2 (now iPad 3).
The iPad 2 was a minor update. But they didn't call it the iPad s or something else equally lame. Every iPhone will have a number until Apple gives up on that completely and just goes with "the all new iPhone" or "the all new 2011 iPhone" like they do with their desktops and notebooks.
Sooner or later, the "g" will sound like an inferior upgrade. It will give people the impression of it being a .5 upgrade. Everybody will wait for a proper number sequel.
The reason why the iPad 2 was named '2' in the very last minute was probably due to the overwhelming speculation that the tech is just a minor upgrade and people want to wait for a proper iPad 2 (now iPad 3).
McGiord
May 3, 09:22 PM
sometimes trying a different brand of discs helps.
-Ken-
Mar 11, 01:34 PM
Two iMac G3s. Macquarium and another to play around with. I never had a Mac until this year. My first PC was in '83 (IBM PC Jr.)
antonwalker
Mar 29, 11:52 PM
i got a couple Q's
1) do you have to pay for diablo monthly
2) How many people still play diablo. It is reasonably old.
1) do you have to pay for diablo monthly
2) How many people still play diablo. It is reasonably old.
btbrossard
Apr 12, 02:57 AM
Option A:
Don't make CDs like that anymore. "If it hurts when you do that, don't do that anymore"
Option B:
Troubleshoot.
What type of computer made this CD? What software was used? What type of mac reads this CD (is your imac newer or older)?
Is it just this one type of CD, or more than one type? Could the drive be dirty?
I have a Mac mini at home that seems to collect more dust than usual. I don't know if it's the smaller vent size or the slower fan, but a bit of dust seems to collect inside. I've taken to using compressed air to blow out the inside on more than one occasion when disc media couldn't be read.
Don't make CDs like that anymore. "If it hurts when you do that, don't do that anymore"
Option B:
Troubleshoot.
What type of computer made this CD? What software was used? What type of mac reads this CD (is your imac newer or older)?
Is it just this one type of CD, or more than one type? Could the drive be dirty?
I have a Mac mini at home that seems to collect more dust than usual. I don't know if it's the smaller vent size or the slower fan, but a bit of dust seems to collect inside. I've taken to using compressed air to blow out the inside on more than one occasion when disc media couldn't be read.
vermiciousknid
Sep 14, 02:03 PM
Hi, new to apple products here. Purchased the 4th gen ipod touch and I'm concerned about protecting the front and back. Would buying a zagg invisibleshield full body (front and back) and also pairing it with a hard candy street skin case work? Or do you think the zagg shield on the back would slip out when I try installing it into the case? Any feedback or advice is appreciated. Thanks
xxchefxx
Jun 21, 03:01 PM
how well do u know brum before i tell you? i dont want to get you lost.
not very well but if you coul point it out on google maps i would be ok
not very well but if you coul point it out on google maps i would be ok
mlblacy
Jan 3, 06:25 AM
a photographer friend and I have a running debate on Epson vs Canon, and we have had both. I recently replaced my large format Epson for a Cannon Pro 9000 Mark II. I paid around $300 (there were some sales and a $100 rebate), although you can find some steals on EBay for mint never unboxed ones (there were some offers that have away the printer with the purchase of a certain camera back). I think I dropped around $800 for my previous Epson...
The 9000 is blazing fast, especially when compared to most Epsons which are notoriously poky. I can print a 13x19 in about 5 minutes, whereas my Epson took easily five times longer. The Epson seemed to chew through ink even when not printing... Startups, preprinting, calibration, head cleanings... But even that didn't stop the continual head cloggings. Pigment ink just tends to dry out and clog a lot more.... Especially if you are not running it every day. I had only had a job every other month, often I had to replace the cartridges... Making the per print price pretty darn expensive. It produced beautiful prints, but I also had to swap black cartridges depending on if I was printing on matte or glossy papers... Pretty lame.
The canon can go borderless at 13x19. It does drink ink at a frightening rate, but at least it does that whle printing, lol. Buy ink at Amazon, get it on a delivery schedule and you will save even more. I pay about half what it costs at staples for ink.
Need a real large format printer? Then I would probably say go Epson...
Cheers,
Michael
The 9000 is blazing fast, especially when compared to most Epsons which are notoriously poky. I can print a 13x19 in about 5 minutes, whereas my Epson took easily five times longer. The Epson seemed to chew through ink even when not printing... Startups, preprinting, calibration, head cleanings... But even that didn't stop the continual head cloggings. Pigment ink just tends to dry out and clog a lot more.... Especially if you are not running it every day. I had only had a job every other month, often I had to replace the cartridges... Making the per print price pretty darn expensive. It produced beautiful prints, but I also had to swap black cartridges depending on if I was printing on matte or glossy papers... Pretty lame.
The canon can go borderless at 13x19. It does drink ink at a frightening rate, but at least it does that whle printing, lol. Buy ink at Amazon, get it on a delivery schedule and you will save even more. I pay about half what it costs at staples for ink.
Need a real large format printer? Then I would probably say go Epson...
Cheers,
Michael
bluemonkeyguy
Apr 14, 12:28 AM
How long would it averagely take to learn the necessary programming/code/flash/html for website #1:
http://www.lesoireebanquethall.com/
and website #2:
http://www.chicowebdesign.com/
I already have the designing/hosting/domain aspects down but I want to just create the website core (see examples above) on my own, without having to sucker up to web designing services that offer templates, etc.. I have master cs5 but i was also wondering applications and (or) learning supplements should i read/watch.
I have no knowledge of html/flash coding/css/php/javascript/etc. Should I just purchase a template or is it feasible to just learn and create my own? I am really eager to learn to create my own (really similar to website #1) but if it is way too much work/hassle, might as well purchase a template.
http://www.lesoireebanquethall.com/
and website #2:
http://www.chicowebdesign.com/
I already have the designing/hosting/domain aspects down but I want to just create the website core (see examples above) on my own, without having to sucker up to web designing services that offer templates, etc.. I have master cs5 but i was also wondering applications and (or) learning supplements should i read/watch.
I have no knowledge of html/flash coding/css/php/javascript/etc. Should I just purchase a template or is it feasible to just learn and create my own? I am really eager to learn to create my own (really similar to website #1) but if it is way too much work/hassle, might as well purchase a template.
Blue Velvet
Mar 25, 03:58 PM
What programs are they using to put these papers together? What precisely do you mean by templates i.e. grids, style sheets, the works?
Many newspapers use proprietary large-scale publishing systems, sometime with their own custom-designed fonts... not something you can just download and use.
Many newspapers use proprietary large-scale publishing systems, sometime with their own custom-designed fonts... not something you can just download and use.
emotion
Oct 25, 09:38 AM
They may not have noticed in Cupertino, but Windows DRM is locking people into Windows just as effectively as Fairplay is locking people into iPods. Apple are allowing Microsoft to get a foothold in a market that Apple should own by now.
Yeah this will leverage Zune sales too.
Yeah this will leverage Zune sales too.
MrMacMan
Jul 21, 11:34 PM
Originally posted by zim
Benny Benassi's video for satisfaction
I guess it is big with the clubs right now.
Apparently it had appeared on apples QT page for a brief moment in time.
--------------------------------
Push me
And then just touch me
Do I can't get my satisfaction
Yeah well acually it seems that they look like they are hosting every video from here:
http://www.video-c.co.uk/home/home.asp
They have a link to there on their main quicktime general site so maybe they have a agreement or something? :confused:
The video still kicks tho.
Benny Benassi's video for satisfaction
I guess it is big with the clubs right now.
Apparently it had appeared on apples QT page for a brief moment in time.
--------------------------------
Push me
And then just touch me
Do I can't get my satisfaction
Yeah well acually it seems that they look like they are hosting every video from here:
http://www.video-c.co.uk/home/home.asp
They have a link to there on their main quicktime general site so maybe they have a agreement or something? :confused:
The video still kicks tho.
lostngone
Apr 12, 04:22 PM
This looks like just another sim overlay solution. Nothing is done to the phone. They use a small IC and just trick the phone into thinking it has an authorized sim in it.
These are not new.
These are not new.
croshtique
Dec 23, 03:19 PM
Myself and a couple of others had this problem recently; my fix was to turn Bluetooth on/off using Bluetooth File Exchange (have a look at this thread (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=161150)).
No comments:
Post a Comment